EVERY 213 Democrat who voted against this needs to be kicked out of Congress

[RX792P]

Interesting you should mention the federal gov and elections..
Seems the Department of Homeland Security tool called the Systematic Alien Verification for Entitlements, or SAVE, has some 'problems'

https://www.texastribune.org/2026/02...kes-confusion/

When county clerk Brianna Lennon got an email in November saying a newly expanded federal system had flagged 74 people on the county’s voter roll as potential noncitizens, she was taken aback.

Lennon, who’d run elections in Boone County, Missouri, for seven years, had heard the tool might not be accurate.

The flagged voters’ registration paperwork confirmed Lennon’s suspicions. The form for the second person on the list bore the initials of a member of her staff, who’d helped the man register — at his naturalization ceremony. It later turned out more than half the Boone County voters identified as noncitizens were actually citizens.
The source of the bad data was a Department of Homeland Security tool called the Systematic Alien Verification for Entitlements, or SAVE.

In Missouri, state officials acted on SAVE’s findings before attempting to confirm them, directing county election administrators to make voters flagged as potential noncitizens temporarily unable to vote. But in hundreds of cases, the tool’s determinations were wrong, our review found.

In Texas
Our reporting showed these errors were more widespread than previously known, involving at least 87 voters across 29 counties.

EVEN WITH SAVE ERRORS
Even counting people flagged in error, the first bulk searches using SAVE haven’t validated the president’s claims that voting by noncitizens is widespread. At least seven states with a total of about 35 million registered voters have publicly reported the results of running their voter rolls through the system. Those searches have identified roughly 4,200 people — about 0.01% of registered voters — as noncitizens.

Sofia Minotti, who lives north of Dallas in Denton County, was born in Argentina but became a U.S. citizen years ago. Nonetheless, she was one of 84 Denton County voters identified by SAVE as a potential noncitizen. She and 11 others have since provided proof of citizenship, giving the system an error rate in the county of at least 14%.

[RX792P]

Meanwhile, early voting for TX primaries starts Feb 17-Feb 27
https://www.texastribune.org/2026/02...les-primaries/

You’ll need one of seven types of valid photo ID to vote in Texas:

A state driver’s license, issued by the Texas Department of Public Safety.
A Texas election identification certificate, issued by DPS.
A Texas personal identification card issued by DPS.
A Texas license to carry a handgun issued by DPS.
A U.S. military ID card with a personal photo.
A U.S. citizenship certificate with a personal photo.
A U.S. passport.

[RX792P]

I would remind of certain words from July 27, 2024


"in four years, you don't have to vote again. We'll have it fixed so good, you're not gonna have to vote."


And today

I would say that many people believe that [elections] may be one of the most important things — that we need to make sure we trust, is reliable, and that when it gets to Election Day, that we’ve been proactive to make sure we have the right people voting, electing the right leaders to lead this country through the days that we have. [And] knowing that people can trust it.

[TechPapi]

We should probably start with the vote cheaters in congress, eh?


No your eyes aren't fooling you. this is a 2ND video of Randy Fine unlawfully casting votes in Florida.

[Precious_b]

Originally Posted by ICU 812

The way I understand the process I California: In primary elections, each party may put candidate son the primary ballot. However, only the top two got getters will appear on the ballot for the general election. This means that

An example: The election is for Dogcatcher of Sumpwater County. Democrats run three candidates. (#1, #2 1nd #3). Republicans run three candidates (#4, #5 and #6).

When the votes are counted, #1 and #3 have the top total;s in the Sumpwater County eprimary election. In the general election for Dog Catcher, only #1 and #3 even paper on the ballot. In effect, the Republican Party in that county cannot choose who they will run for Dog Catcher against a Democrat candidate.

In California, the so called "Primary Election" is in reality just a preliminary run-off for the general election. In many counties, Republican voters never have the opportunity to vote for a Republican candidate in the general election.

Than why have the voters not filed a law suit about it? Well, maybe they have. And if not currently in court, the result must have been settled to where the current system is not challenged.

As I stated:
"

Originally Posted by Precious_b

...And as long of each parties constituents legal wishes are honoured, what do i care?...

"

Originally Posted by offshoredrilling

It is hilarious the dozens and dozens of times maggies filed cases about what they screamed in the streets, and still do while having tears in their eyes, ...fraud but were too chickenshit to peep one syllable of fraud in legal filings.

A BIG FAT ZERO wins in court because they were too scared to bring proof of fraud. That's on y'all maggies.

[RX792P]

https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2...ort-outsiders/

Calling the Republican Party under Trump the “America First movement,” Moore told Breitbart News’s Matthew Boyle that the “Democrats’ only play is to go hard left and then allow illegals, people who are not citizens, to vote because American citizens don’t want what they’re trying to shove down our throats.”

Two points
- If there are these vast numbers of these 'illegals voting' (presumably enough to influence elections), why has no one yet been able to produce evidence of it?
- The SAVE Act does not require re-registration of existing voters...thereby leaving these 'voting illegals' on the voter rolls for at least a couple of election cycles.

[Jacuzzme]

There’s not nearly enough voter suppression, way too many voting that have no business doing so. At the very least the age requirement should be 35, 40 or 50 even better, and property owners. Anyone on government assistance of any kind, you’re also out.

[RX792P]

Originally Posted by Jacuzzme

There’s not nearly enough voter suppression, way too many voting that have no business doing so. At the very least the age requirement should be 35, 40 or 50 even better, and property owners. Anyone on government assistance of any kind, you’re also out.

Hey, all that is required to implement your 'suggestions' is a Constitution change...

[Jacuzzme]

That’s what amendments are for. This guy from a 1951 Oklahoman newspaper puts it perfectly, a quote often misattributed to Ben Franklin.

“A democracy cannot exist as a permanent form of government. It can only exist until the majority discovers it can vote itself largess out of the public treasury. After that, the majority always votes for the candidate promising the most benefits with the result the democracy collapses because of the loose fiscal policy ensuing, always to be followed by a dictatorship, then a monarchy."

[Jacuzzme]

Double

[Turner2099]

Originally Posted by Jacuzzme

There’s not nearly enough voter suppression, way too many voting that have no business doing so. At the very least the age requirement should be 35, 40 or 50 even better, and property owners. Anyone on government assistance of any kind, you’re also out.

Medicare is government assistance.

[rooster]

Originally Posted by Jacuzzme

This guy from a 1951 Oklahoman newspaper puts it perfectly...

“A democracy cannot exist as a permanent form of government....

Whatta crock. Simplistic drivel. Cuz we are certainly seeing ANOTHER way that "democracy collapses"....a corrupt lying Fascist lunatic convinces 77 Million people to forsake their morals and common sense.

"I care about you!" and "Only I can save you!"

And...of course "I am not a crook (or a rapist, or a racist, or a mysogynyst)..."

.

[RX792P]

https://www.newsmax.com/newsmax-tv/r...16/id/1246329/

Rep. Byron Donalds, R-Fla., told Newsmax that he would throw his full support behind an executive order from President Donald Trump to require voter ID to participate in federal elections.

But he said that will not dampen his support for nationwide use of voter ID since it has worked well in Florida. "But let's also be very clear in Florida, we have voter ID, we've had it for as long as I've lived in Florida; that's 30 years.

"It's never been a problem for anybody being able to cast their ballot in the great state of Florida."

Just a point of order regards SAVE Act and Voter ID

In Florida, you do not have to show documentary proof of citizenship (like a passport or birth certificate) when you register to vote — but you must swear or affirm that you are a U.S. citizen.

Florida does have voter ID requirement to cast a vote.
Florida law lists specific photo IDs that are acceptable. You only need one ID with photo and signature (or a photo ID plus a second ID with your signature if the photo ID doesn’t have a signature).

Common acceptable IDs include:

Florida driver license
Florida identification card (issued by the Department of Highway Safety and Motor Vehicles)
United States passport
Debit or credit card with photo
Military identification card
Student identification card
Retirement center identification
Neighborhood association identification
Public assistance identification with photo
Veteran health identification card issued by the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs
Concealed weapon or firearm license issued under Florida law
Employee identification card issued by federal, state, county, or municipal government
If your photo ID does not include your signature, you must also present another form of ID that contains your signature.

[RX792P]

Noem 'justifies' her 'right people' remarks...

“Yes, we must build election infrastructure that makes it easy and secure for eligible American citizens to vote—while preventing non-citizens, including illegal aliens, from casting ballots. The choice of who to vote for is obviously up to the voters themselves.”

Good to know...

Do you actually support allowing people who are in this country illegally to vote in our elections?”

Ms Noem, I think you will find absolutely no evidence of any 'support for illegal votes'.

[rooster]

Originally Posted by RX792P

....
Ms Noem, I think you will find absolutely no evidence of any 'support for illegal votes'.

None. Just like you will find no evidence of widespread voting by them. But MAGA can't think for themselves here. They only believe what Fox et al tell them.

(queue the '84 percent of the voting public want this!' knee-jerk brainwashed pundits...)

.