Clintons Headed For Prison??

[Salty Again]

Originally Posted by Yssup Rider

There is no crying in the political forum.

Make a claim, back it up. Or else suffer the slings and arrows of outrageous fortune.

You ought to hold your insiders to account, Salty. I think they’re sureley leading you douwn the primouse path.

... I can surely back-up me claim with Nancy Mace.
... Right?

... And to correct you yet-again -- this aint the political forum.

So, I can back-up me claim with Nancy Mace. ...

... And as I mention - the benefit of this was to have
the Clintons answer questions... So the Committee
can then weigh the answers against whatever EVIDENCE
the FBI/DOJ may already have.... And they can decide
whether to charge the Clintons with any crimes -- or not.

... So - Just Wait!

##### Salty

[fd-guy]

Originally Posted by Salty Again

... I can surely back-up me claim with Nancy Mace.
... Right?

... And to correct you yet-again -- this aint the political forum.

So, I can back-up me claim with Nancy Mace. ...

... And as I mention - the benefit of this was to have
the Clintons answer questions... So the Committee
can then weigh the answers against whatever EVIDENCE
the FBI/DOJ may already have.... And they can decide
whether to charge the Clintons with any crimes -- or not.

... So - Just Wait!

##### Salty

If you’re saying Nancy Mace has publicly confirmed a committee is gathering testimony specifically to weigh charges against the Clintons, feel free to link the statement. I’m just trying to separate what’s publicly documented from what’s still in the ‘wait’ category

[rooster]

Originally Posted by Salty Again

... I can surely back-up me claim with Nancy Mace.
... Right?

So, I can back-up me claim with Nancy Mace. ...

Oh, I literally CANNOT FUCKING WAIT to see where you are going with this...

Originally Posted by fd-guy

If you’re saying Nancy Mace has publicly confirmed a committee is gathering testimony specifically to weigh charges against the Clintons, feel free to link the statement. I’m just trying to separate what’s publicly documented from what’s still in the ‘wait’ category

YES PLEASE! Tell us what the precious briny "insiders" are saying about Nancy Mace! PLEASE!!

(I say all the time that MAGA cannot be made to look worse than they make themselves look....but Nancy Mace...yeah, she can DEFINITELY make them look worse...)

.

[Salty Again]

... What I'm saying IS that Nancy Mace has CONFIRMED that
Hillary Clinton had a rough time answering questions, and also
lost her temper during the discussions.

... Just as I had mentioned.
... See? ... Salty KNOWS! ... ...

#### Salty

[rooster]

Originally Posted by Salty Again

... What I'm saying IS that Nancy Mace has CONFIRMED that
Hillary Clinton had a rough time answering questions, and also
lost her temper during the discussions.
....

So...that's it, huh?

Nancy Mace? "Confirmed" this..."difficult time"?

Whew. Some scary shit....

You have GOT to be kidding us? That is so fucking lame that I would not have believed that even you would post it.

Nancy Mace. That is as desperate as you could possibly get....

Let's recap: the sum outcome of these hearings is that Nancy-fucking-Mace said Hillary Clinton had a "difficult time" answering questions and "lost her temper."

Awesome. We should all be so proud.

(I would sure AF hope that she lost her temper, having to answer questions from a moronic lunatic like Nancy Mace...)

.

[Yssup Rider]

Sorry, apparently there IS crying in the sandbox… or pretty much anywhere OP posts.

At least he NAMED one of his “political, errrr, sandbox insiders.”

He’s channeling Nancy Mace.

Isn’t she from down under too?

[fd-guy]

Originally Posted by Salty Again

... What I'm saying IS that Nancy Mace has CONFIRMED that
Hillary Clinton had a rough time answering questions, and also
lost her temper during the discussions.

... Just as I had mentioned.
... See? ... Salty KNOWS! ... ...

#### Salty

That’s a different claim. Saying someone had a ‘rough time’ answering questions or lost their temper isn’t the same thing as confirming a committee is weighing criminal charges.

Tone and temperament make for interesting anecdotes, but they’re not the same as formal legal exposure. I’m still asking whether there’s a public statement confirming charges are being considered.

‘Salty KNOWS’ is entertaining, but I’m just looking for documentation.

[rooster]

Originally Posted by fd-guy

....
‘Salty KNOWS’ is entertaining, but I’m just looking for documentation.

I would use nauseating instead of entertaining....

Well...he will probably say JUST WAIT...but there's no need. This thread should die a natural death from boredom any day now. He might try to keep it alive, and that could be fun to shit on for a bit longer. But no one actually cares...and did not from the beginning.

.