I Choose Dogs Over Islam. What Say Democrats?

[Schwarzer Ritter]

Death penalty without that due process you yell about? Can you spell hypocrisy?

[txdot-guy]

Originally Posted by Schwarzer Ritter

Death penalty without that due process you yell about? Can you spell hypocrisy?

The due process is when the police told people they were trespassing and they didn’t leave.

[Yssup Rider]

Originally Posted by Schwarzer Ritter

Death penalty without that due process you yell about? Can you spell hypocrisy?

Apples and pine cones, buddy.

[Schwarzer Ritter]

You realize what you're advocating? Execution for trespassing. Unarmed, simple trespass where the location doesn't matter. I can assume that based on that logic, execution is the outcome of raising your hands to law enforcement. That includes ICE agents and Border Patrol. Everything that you blathered about Minneapolis is absolute hypocrisy. You lost all your credibility bots.

My world says to arrest people, charge them, and have them serve time depending on the circumstances.

Your world is a quick execution by law enforcement based on the opinion of a law enforcement officer.

Which version sounds like an authoritarian government?

[Yssup Rider]

Bots? YOU'RE calling someone a BOT?

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAH!

We live in the same world. You choose to make it separate.

Now how about discussing the topic of the thread, which is dogs vs. Islam. I know, it's hard not to hijack a stellar subject like this, but you've found a way to troll a troll's troll thread.

[txdot-guy]

Originally Posted by Schwarzer Ritter

You realize what you're advocating? Execution for trespassing. Unarmed, simple trespass where the location doesn't matter. I can assume that based on that logic, execution is the outcome of raising your hands to law enforcement. That includes ICE agents and Border Patrol. Everything that you blathered about Minneapolis is absolute hypocrisy. You lost all your credibility bots.

My world says to arrest people, charge them, and have them serve time depending on the circumstances.

Your world is a quick execution by law enforcement based on the opinion of a law enforcement officer.

Which version sounds like an authoritarian government?

If someone is breaking the window in your back door and trying to enter your home without permission do you shoot them?

I’m not advocating for police to shoot anyone they want but your characterization of the situation is off. Ashli Babbitt was part of a mob that was violently breaking into the house chambers wanting to capture or assault our public servants. That’s the kind of thing that will get you shot by the police.

I may disagree with Congressman Randy Fine about this stupid bill that he wants to be made into law, but that doesn’t give anyone the right to break into his house and threaten him or his family. I would hope that you could see the point but apparently not.

In any event you’ve pulled us off topic. I’m done.

Peace Brother!

[Schwarzer Ritter]

Someone breaking in my window...I won't kill them for that. I'll give them a chance, one chance, to surrender before I take any other action. Warning though, if they make a single aggressive action towards me...all bets are off.
As for the capital, you're making a mighty big assumption bordering on ridiculous. No elected official was manhandled by anyone. That would be like a policeman shooting someone for wearing a red bandanna because gang bangers are known to wear red bandannas.
I'm starting to think that you all have no idea how poor your logic is or how thin the ice is under you.

You are all a massive mess.

You're dog would make better choices bringing this thing back to the OP.

[biomed1]

Thread so far off topic it can't return.

Thread Closed