Shhh! Don’t Tell Republicans That Women Vote!

[TheDaliLama]

I'm all for tax funded castrations of Liberals.

[IIFFOFRDB]

Originally Posted by TheDaliLama

I'm all for tax funded castrations of Liberals.

Hell I was going to say I would help pay for their rubbers. I like your ideal better.

[MC]

Originally Posted by TheDaliLama

I'm all for tax funded castrations of Liberals.

The sad thing is he's probably for it in real life.

[CuteOldGuy]

Originally Posted by Sidewinder

Nobody is denying women access to those meds. They're just saying that they will not pay for them.

There is nothing whatsoever stopping the Liberals from pulling out their checkbooks and setting up a charitable foundation to pay for contraceptives for those women whose health insurance refuses to pay for them, except for their oft-demonstrated extreme aversion to using Their Own Money to do anything.

(Yes, I'm being a little bit nasty nasty. It's been an unpleasant last few weeks.)

+1

[TheDaliLama]

Originally Posted by Sidewinder

Nobody is denying women access to those meds. They're just saying that they will not pay for them.

Isn't it already free at Planned Parenthood?

[Doove]

If the Bishops had any intellectual honesty, they'd be more vocal about the 80% or so of their flock - both the men and the women - whom are seemingly going to rot in hell for relying on contraceptives in their relationships.

But then, doing that would likely take passing the plate and rendering it an exercise in futility.

[CuteOldGuy]

Doove? Demanding intellectual honesty? Now THAT's Funny!



That makes this whole thread worth it!!

[Sidewinder]

Originally Posted by TheDaliLama

Isn't it already free at Planned Parenthood?

Apparently not, since Obama and Karen Sebelius apparently feel that it is critically necessary to force the employer's insurance plans to provide it.

If the need is already fully covered, why does it need to be multiply-covered?

[JD Barleycorn]

Originally Posted by CJ7

so youre in favor of religion ruling the government ?

so much for church and state eh?

You make quite a leap of logic there. I think you fell far short of the other side. See you at the bottom.

[BigLouie]

Contraceptive use among American women who have had sex (2006-2008). Note: Excludes natural family planning.

One Simple Chart That Explains Why Conservatives Will Lose The Birth Control Debate

[JD Barleycorn]

Another cut and paste Louie... boring and irrelevant.


Have you accepted the fact that all these rights were voted into law by the GOP and not democrats?

[Randy4Candy]

Originally Posted by CuteOldGuy

Doove? Demanding intellectual honesty? Now THAT's Funny!



That makes this whole thread worth it!!

And your answer to his question was........................... .

[Doove]

Originally Posted by Sidewinder

Apparently not, since Obama and Karen Sebelius apparently feel that it is critically necessary to force the employer's insurance plans to provide it.

If the need is already fully covered, why does it need to be multiply-covered?

Dunno. Perhaps we can ask the 28 states that have the same regulation.

My best guess, however, is that if every woman who used contraception relied on planned parenthood for it, then it wouldn't, in fact, be fully covered. Just a hunch.

[JD Barleycorn]

I'm not too sure about that 28 state thing. The other night Rachel Maddow was hyping it and then Lawrence O'Donnell come on afterwards and said it all bunk. That's MSNBC, they contradict themselves on the same night so they can say they covered it, whatever it was.

[Doove]

Originally Posted by JD Barleycorn

I'm not too sure about that 28 state thing. The other night Rachel Maddow was hyping it and then Lawrence O'Donnell come on afterwards and said it all bunk.

Oh, ok. Because you say that Lawrence O'Donnell said it's bunk, then i guess it's bunk.