Main Menu |
Most Favorited Images |
Recently Uploaded Images |
Most Liked Images |
Top Reviewers |
cockalatte |
650 |
MoneyManMatt |
490 |
Jon Bon |
408 |
Still Looking |
399 |
samcruz |
399 |
Harley Diablo |
377 |
honest_abe |
362 |
George Spelvin |
316 |
DFW_Ladies_Man |
313 |
Starscream66 |
302 |
Chung Tran |
288 |
lupegarland |
287 |
nicemusic |
285 |
You&Me |
281 |
sharkman29 |
263 |
|
Top Posters |
DallasRain | 71370 | biomed1 | 67980 | Yssup Rider | 62981 | gman44 | 55079 | LexusLover | 51038 | offshoredrilling | 49530 | WTF | 48272 | pyramider | 46430 | bambino | 45243 | The_Waco_Kid | 40073 | CryptKicker | 37400 | Mokoa | 36507 | Chung Tran | 36100 | Still Looking | 35944 | Dr-epg | 34572 |
|
|
05-11-2012, 10:28 AM
|
#61
|
Valued Poster
Join Date: May 20, 2010
Location: Wichita
Posts: 28,730
|
This is silly. Nobody is trying to impose anything on anyone. Gays simply want to be able to live their lives in honesty and peace. The only reason it's a big deal is because the evangelical crowd wants everyone to live by the Bible, that is, the parts of the Bible that fit into their worldview. They like to leave things out, like killing disobedient children, sending women out of town when they're on the rag, etc. (Hmmm . . . maybe . . . no, never mind.)
Bill Clinton did more to negatively effect the state of marriage in the US than gays ever could.
|
|
Quote
 | 1 user liked this post
|
05-11-2012, 10:28 AM
|
#62
|
Lifetime Premium Access
Join Date: Jan 1, 2010
Location: houston
Posts: 48,272
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by boardman
Big Jake can't wait till he can marry his goats...
Once this line is crossed it's just a matter of time until it happens.
|
Are you saying that a goat and a gay person are one and the same?
What line are you talking about?
Gay sex is legal, why should they not be allowed to marry?
Why do you want to restrict who a person of legal age and sound mind wants to marry, mutually. Not sure if we have figured out if a goat is willing to marry Jake. Once you have figured come back and talk about this comparison.
Two people of sound mind and legal age should be able to marry. Race or gender should not have a thing to do with it.
|
|
Quote
 | 1 user liked this post
|
05-11-2012, 10:31 AM
|
#63
|
Lifetime Premium Access
Join Date: Jan 1, 2010
Location: houston
Posts: 48,272
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by CuteOldGuy
This is silly. Nobody is trying to impose anything on anyone. Gays simply want to be able to live their lives in honesty and peace. The only reason it's a big deal is because the evangelical crowd wants everyone to live by the Bible, that is, the parts of the Bible that fit into their worldview. They like to leave things out, like killing disobedient children, sending women out of town when they're on the rag, etc. (Hmmm . . . maybe . . . no, never mind.)
.
|
Agreed
Quote:
Originally Posted by CuteOldGuy
Bill Clinton did more to negatively effect the state of marriage in the US than gays ever could.
|
Disagree, they are still married. It shows that people are not perfect ant there is no such thing as a perfect marriage. They showed us that and showed us how to stick it out.
|
|
Quote
 | 1 user liked this post
|
05-11-2012, 10:31 AM
|
#64
|
Valued Poster
Join Date: Jan 3, 2010
Location: South of Chicago
Posts: 31,214
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by WTF
Not one that imposes his/her POV onto others.Conservatives live their life's POV's , they do not impose them on others or restrict others from living theirs.See! You did it again. You are ignoring the principal issue in this debate. It's the LBGT that's seeking to impose their unnatural world view on society; not vice versa.
Yours is Dogmatic in this regard. Slight difference
|
BTW, the definition of 'dogmatic' is: "characterized by or given to the expression of opinions very strongly or positively as if they were facts." Since you are arguing 'opinion' against established social and scientific facts, it is you who is being 'dogmatic'.
.
Quote:
Originally Posted by WTF
It is only unnatural to you and I . It is not unnatural to them.
Next they are not trying to impose it upon you and I. They are trying to do what comes natural to them. You are trying to impose your POV on them by denying the the same rights you have. The right to marry the person they love. That is wtf you are really trying to do.
|
As a self-proclaimed man of science, you know better. You cannot support your argument with a solitary example wherein a child was naturally spawned from the sexual activities in a same sex relationship; hence, same sex relationships are, by definition, 'unnatural'. Argue, if you wish, with Darwin.
|
|
Quote
 | 1 user liked this post
|
05-11-2012, 10:36 AM
|
#65
|
Valued Poster
Join Date: Jan 3, 2010
Location: South of Chicago
Posts: 31,214
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by CuteOldGuy
This is silly. Nobody is trying to impose anything on anyone. Gays simply want to be able to live their lives in honesty and peace. The only reason it's a big deal is because the evangelical crowd wants everyone to live by the Bible, that is, the parts of the Bible that fit into their worldview. They like to leave things out, like killing disobedient children, sending women out of town when they're on the rag, etc. (Hmmm . . . maybe . . . no, never mind.)
Bill Clinton did more to negatively effect the state of marriage in the US than gays ever could.
|
If it's not important, why won't a 'civil union' suffice for the LBGT community?
|
|
Quote
 | 1 user liked this post
|
05-11-2012, 10:37 AM
|
#66
|
Valued Poster
Join Date: Jan 18, 2010
Location: texas (close enough for now)
Posts: 9,249
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by WTF
Are you saying that a goat and a gay person are one and the same?
What line are you talking about?
Gay sex is legal, why should they not be allowed to marry?
|
theres your fallacy, why cant goat lover sex be legal
|
|
Quote
 | 1 user liked this post
|
05-11-2012, 10:38 AM
|
#67
|
Valued Poster
Join Date: May 20, 2010
Location: Wichita
Posts: 28,730
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by I B Hankering
[INDENT] As a self-proclaimed man of science, you know better. You cannot support your argument with a solitary example wherein a child was naturally spawned from the sexual activities in a same sex relationship; hence, same sex relationships are, by definition, 'unnatural'. Argue, if you wish, with Darwin.
|
That only holds if we buy into the idea that sex is only for procreation. I don't buy that. And anyone on here who has sex for fun or other reasons doesn't either.
If sex is only for procreation, then we must all be Catholics.
|
|
Quote
 | 1 user liked this post
|
05-11-2012, 10:44 AM
|
#68
|
Lifetime Premium Access
Join Date: Jan 1, 2010
Location: houston
Posts: 48,272
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by I B Hankering
BTW, the definition of 'dogmatic' is: "characterized by or given to the expression of opinions very strongly or positively as if they were facts." Since you are arguing 'opinion' against established social and scientific facts, it is you who is being 'dogmatic'.
.
.
|
I am arguing opinion vs. opinion as it pertains to right or wrong.
I am arguing facts as it pertains to discrimination.
I am arguing facts as it pertains to the evolution of blacks and whites being able to marry and now gays. I argue that you are on the losing side of this issue. The facts are in my corner.
We can argue right or wrong on the issue till the cows come home and never solve a thing.
Quote:
Originally Posted by I B Hankering
.
As a self-proclaimed man of science, you know better. You cannot support your argument with a solitary example wherein a child was naturally spawned from the sexual activities in a same sex relationship; hence, same sex relationships are, by definition, 'unnatural'. Argue, if you wish, with Darwin.
|
Only if you believe that marriage is only for procreation. Is that what you believe? Gay sex in the animal kingdom is natural, it happens all the time. It is only innatural if you are forced to do it. Nobody is forcing you to marry nor watch gay sex. Gay sex is different from marriage. You keep forgetting that fact.
Not letting Gays marry is discrimination. That is a fact, no matter how long a tradition , it does not change the fact that it is discrimination.
|
|
Quote
 | 1 user liked this post
|
05-11-2012, 10:47 AM
|
#69
|
Making Pussy Great Again
Join Date: Jan 4, 2010
Location: In your closet, in your head...
Posts: 16,093
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by WTF
Are you saying that a goat and a gay person are one and the same?
What line are you talking about?
Gay sex is legal, why should they not be allowed to marry?
Why do you want to restrict who a person of legal age and sound mind wants to marry, mutually. Not sure if we have figured out if a goat is willing to marry Jake. Once you have figured come back and talk about this comparison.
Two people of sound mind and legal age should be able to marry. Race or gender should not have a thing to do with it.
|
Ok, now you want to qualify it to make it legal for two people of sound mind and legal age. Aren't you now, in fact, discriminating?
|
|
Quote
 | 1 user liked this post
|
05-11-2012, 10:47 AM
|
#70
|
Lifetime Premium Access
Join Date: Jan 1, 2010
Location: houston
Posts: 48,272
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by nevergaveitathought
theres your fallacy, why cant goat lover sex be legal
|
Because a goat can not give his/her permission to have sex. It is rape. Goat rape. Are you for rape.
What part of mutual sex do you not understand?
What part of age of consent will you not understand.
Find me a goat that can convey his approval of having sex with you and wants to sign a marriage document and I will say go for it
|
|
Quote
 | 1 user liked this post
|
05-11-2012, 10:49 AM
|
#71
|
Valued Poster
Join Date: May 20, 2010
Location: Wichita
Posts: 28,730
|
You want us to find you a goat, WTF? WTF!
|
|
Quote
 | 1 user liked this post
|
05-11-2012, 10:51 AM
|
#72
|
Lifetime Premium Access
Join Date: Jan 1, 2010
Location: houston
Posts: 48,272
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by boardman
Ok, now you want to qualify it to make it legal for two people of sound mind and legal age. Aren't you now, in fact, discriminating?
|
Yes but not by sex of race or creed. That is what you people do not understand. The age has risen over the years but not just for blacks or whites or straight people or gay people but for all people. Yes you have to be a certain age to enter into a legal contract. When did that become a slippery slope?
|
|
Quote
 | 1 user liked this post
|
05-11-2012, 10:52 AM
|
#73
|
Lifetime Premium Access
Join Date: Jan 1, 2010
Location: houston
Posts: 48,272
|
Can you find a goat that can sign a marriage contract?
Quote:
Originally Posted by CuteOldGuy
You want us to find you a goat, WTF? WTF!
|
You are to old a goat GOG but thanks for the offer!
Can you find a goat that can sign a marriage contract?
|
|
Quote
 | 1 user liked this post
|
05-11-2012, 10:53 AM
|
#74
|
Valued Poster
Join Date: May 20, 2010
Location: Wichita
Posts: 28,730
|
LOL! Thanks but no thanks. But that was funny!
|
|
Quote
 | 1 user liked this post
|
05-11-2012, 10:56 AM
|
#75
|
Making Pussy Great Again
Join Date: Jan 4, 2010
Location: In your closet, in your head...
Posts: 16,093
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by WTF
Because a goat can not give his/her permission to have sex. It is rape. Goat rape. Are you for rape.
What part of mutual sex do you not understand?
What part of age of consent will you not understand.
Find me a goat that can convey his approval of having sex with you and wants to sign a marriage document and I will say go for it
|
Do you mean that because you cannot communicate with Jakes goat that no one else can. If Jake tells us that his goat has communicated in some way her love for Jake who are we to tell him it's not true?
If Jake's goat backs up to a stump and lifts her tail and allows it, is that not consent?
|
|
Quote
 | 1 user liked this post
|
|
AMPReviews.net |
Find Ladies |
Hot Women |
|