Welcome to ECCIE - Sign up today!

Old-T · 08-23-2012, 02:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jcase5848

It's bad enough that the fucktard republican asswipes want to legislate away the woman's right to her body and her health but here's a nuggest I bet you didn't know: 31 states allow a rapist to file for custodial and parental rights....WHAT THE FUCK????
http://www.cnn.com/2012/08/22/opinio...hts/index.html

That is unquestionably sick.

Yssup Rider · 08-23-2012, 03:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by I B Hankering

You're the one who unwisely started with unfounded assumptions and the statement you are criticizing is no more idiotic than yours, Yssup.

BTW, your second post -- with more assumptions -- is as idiotic as the first.

I'm assuming that you're entirely full of shit. You're criticizing my comment. Not the substance of it. (WAIT FOR IT ... WAIT FOR IT...) Typical Dittohead Response. (Ahhh! That felt good!)

How about a broad generalization? A lumpen label? A "you people?"

(BTW -- idiot or not, I really hope you don't get pregnant by accident)

I B Hankering · 08-23-2012, 03:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Yssup Rider

I'm assuming that you're entirely full of shit. You're criticizing my comment. Not the substance of it. (WAIT FOR IT ... WAIT FOR IT...) Typical Dittohead Response. (Ahhh! That felt good!)

How about a broad generalization? A lumpen label? A "you people?"

(BTW -- idiot or not, I really hope you don't get pregnant by accident)

Your inane comments have no substance; hence, they deserve derision. Wise-up, Yssup!!!

WTF · 08-23-2012, 03:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Old-T

That is unquestionably sick.

Sick but true.

In theory, if you were a woman, raped and became preggo, made to have the kid under GOP rule, you then , in theory may have to share custody of that product of rape.

In reality , the GOP would want nothing to do with the kid , they would want to spend as little money as possible to feed or educate him/her until he/she was old enough to go to prison, then they gladlly spend 30k a year to incarcerate them.

What a fucking plan! Our righties must be invested heavily in the private prison system

WTF · 08-23-2012, 03:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Old-T

Thank you. That was exactly my point.

Your welcome.

I have been asking that same question for years, so I knw exactly what you meant.

CuteOldGuy · 08-23-2012, 04:04 PM

There have been women who have kept the child conceived during a rape, and have ended up not regretting it at all. But still, it was her choice. What's wrong with having a choice?

Old-T · 08-23-2012, 04:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CuteOldGuy

There have been women who have kept the child conceived during a rape, and have ended up not regretting it at all. But still, it was her choice. What's wrong with having a choice?

I must have missed to post about either side wanting to force a woman to have an abortion. Please point that one out to me.

gnadfly · 08-23-2012, 04:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jcase5848

It's bad enough that the fucktard republican asswipes want to legislate away the woman's right to her body and her health but here's a nuggest I bet you didn't know: 31 states allow a rapist to file for custodial and parental rights....WHAT THE FUCK????
http://www.cnn.com/2012/08/22/opinio...hts/index.html

Mmm, Sandra Fluke and Prewitt are both from Georgetown University.

Anybody read the PDF of Prewitt that she quotes from her own article? She wrote it.

NO CITES OF VERIFIED CONVICTED RAPISTS WINNING VISITATION RIGHTS OF THEIR VICTIMS BABIES!

A lot of "estimated." A lot of "surveys." She even distinguishes between types of rapes. No "legitimate rape" stats though. Stopped after a couple of pages. Scanned for FBI or "legitimate" law enforcement agency cites. She quotes "Blog Entries."

I know that a lot of women don't report rape for "legitimate" reasons and am sympathetic to those reasons and those women. I also know a lot of guys are let out of prison on "legitimate rape" convictions having those convictions overturned for "legitimate reasons."

Another word parsing article from the Democratic Socialist media rape squad.

CuteOldGuy · 08-23-2012, 04:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Old-T

I must have missed to post about either side wanting to force a woman to have an abortion. Please point that one out to me.

I was making a point about choice, not force. Please pay attention, Old-T. No one said anything about forcing an abortion.

Old-T · 08-23-2012, 05:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CuteOldGuy

There have been women who have kept the child conceived during a rape, and have ended up not regretting it at all. But still, it was her choice. What's wrong with having a choice?

Quote:

Originally Posted by Old-T

I must have missed to post about either side wanting to force a woman to have an abortion. Please point that one out to me.

Quote:

Originally Posted by CuteOldGuy

I was making a point about choice, not force. Please pay attention, Old-T. No one said anything about forcing an abortion.

OK, since no one was talking about forcing an abortion--then why did you feel the need to imply "it's good she had the choice to keep the baby". If you were not implying a forced abortion there is no need for you to make that post.

WTF · 08-23-2012, 08:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by gnadfly

NO CITES OF VERIFIED CONVICTED RAPISTS WINNING VISITATION RIGHTS OF THEIR VICTIMS BABIES!

.

We are talking about rape, not the voter fraud!

CuteOldGuy · 08-23-2012, 09:06 PM

Never mind, Old-T. It was a simple statement. No wonder you couldn't figure it out.

We're on the same side here, and you still want to pick a fight with me. Not happening. Have a nice day.

WTF · 08-23-2012, 10:03 PM

Old-t, I thing COG was saying that women should have a choice. I hate defending the old shit stirring bastard but he ain't all bad.

Goes a tad overboard on the Obama bashing but WTF.

Doove · 08-24-2012, 04:07 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Old-T

OK, since no one was talking about forcing an abortion--then why did you feel the need to imply "it's good she had the choice to keep the baby". If you were not implying a forced abortion there is no need for you to make that post.

While i don't think he was going anywhere near the idea of forced abortion, given his posting history, i can see how you could easily come to the conclusion that he was.

WTF · 08-24-2012, 04:45 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OliviaHoward

I went back and re-read it. I still say what he posted is how he feels about abortion. If that’s the case, then his, and people that think like him, young daughters needs to have the zygote implanted and she / they can gestate and raise the product of violence. But, if he wants to comment he can.

.

Go back and re read it one more time. Then read his simple explaination. It is exactly as I said. We both (Old-T and I) think it total BS that folks can think that abortion is murder but then turn around and say that murder is ok because of rape or incest.

I personally do not think abortion murder if done early.