Quote:
Originally Posted by The_Waco_Kid
disagree with you and Tiny here. the Obama plan was intentionally to allow Iran nuclear weapons. Iran cheated on the agreement...
|
I wouldn't put it that way, Waco. I'd say the Obama plan (the so-called JCPOA signed in Oct. 2015) just tried to kick the can down the road, delaying Iran's nuclear program until Obama was safely out of office. You know - let the next guy deal with what happens after the various restrictions run out in 6-10 years. Obama responded to criticism of the deal's sunset provisions by saying we can always do the military strike option later if they refuse to negotiate another 10-year deal in 2025. To me, that was a bad argument for a flawed agreement. Everyone knows the longer Israel refrains from taking out Iran's proliferating nuclear facilities, the harder the task becomes.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tiny
I believe we were better with the treaty than without it, as Iran was less likely to progress to a bomb.The sanctions and other pressure Trump put on Iran didn’t do a lot of good IMO. So you had Iran making more progress towards developing nuclear weapons than it would have otherwise.
|
Generally, I share your skepticism when it comes to sanctions. But trump's renewal of the "maximum pressure" campaign against Iran in 2018 did help to choke off the flow of funds to the mullahs and thereby inhibit their ability to stir up trouble using their proxies i.e. Hezbollah, Hamas, Houthis, Shia allies in Iraq etc.
Then Biden came in and lifted the sanctions in 2021. The results were a disaster. They show why it's impossible to trust the Iranian mullahs. Instead of saying ok thanks, we'll tone it down, they funneled the billions they received from Biden's sanctions relief right back into the hands of their terrorist proxies.
If you really want to assign proximate blame for the Hamas attack on Oct. 7, 2023 you might consider how much additional funding and other support did Hamas receive from Iran after Biden loosened the screws.