The Epstein Files: The DOJ Is Engaged in a Massive Cover-Up

[pxmcc]

where are all the Trump photos? let's not forget these 2 gents were best friends for years.

and why the 10 million redactions? the only words that should be redacted are the names of the vics.

and why only drip-drip-drip releases? last Friday was the deadline for all Epstein files to be released, not those of a select few that "just so happen" to feature WJC.

the vics need to sue and the court needs to appoint a Special Master to ensure the DOJ is complying with the law. **spoiler alert** it's not. bigly..

then the DOJ needs to be held in contempt, with progessively nastier sanctions for every new day of wilful refusal to comply with the federal law requiring full disclosure, including having Pam Bondi locked up until she releases all the files, and the Special Master is satisfied that any proposed redactions are necessary only to protect the identities of the vics, not the reputations of the perps, excluding Dems Trump is attempting to disgrace, like WJC, whose reps will be destroyed by Bondi and Trump to the greatest extent possible.

thoughts?

[MisterMeat]

The Epstein scandal is the albatross around Trump's neck. His entire regime is scared as hell, which is why the stuff they are releasing is heavily redacted. I think I might try to do the same on my 2026 Federal income tax return.

[Budman]

Ya'll are so full of shit it's spewing out of your mouth. If there was anything incrimanating Trump it would have been released long before the election. You know right along with all the russia colusion evidence and the pee tape. Oh wait, there wasn't any evidence or a pee tape. Just more made up shit from the left.

[pxmcc]

just because the Biden admin-whose DOJ admittedly had the Epstein files-believed in following process and procedure, politics be damned, doesn't mean Trump is innocent.
*spoiler alert*he's not..

Originally Posted by Budman

Ya'll are so full of shit it's spewing out of your mouth. If there was anything incrimanating Trump it would have been released long before the election. You know right along with all the russia colusion evidence and the pee tape. Oh wait, there wasn't any evidence or a pee tape. Just more made up shit from the left.

[Budman]

Originally Posted by pxmcc

just because the Biden admin-whose DOJ admittedly had the Epstein files-believed in following process and procedure, politics be damned, doesn't mean Trump is innocent.
*spoiler alert*he's not..

You can't be serious. That is one of the dumbest statements ever posted in this shit hole. Congrats.

[pxmcc]

Originally Posted by Budman

You can't be serious. That is one of the dumbest statements ever posted in this shit hole. Congrats.

so Trump is innocent?

bahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha hahahahahahaha...

that's one of the dumbest contentions ever posted here. congrats..

and there is no cover-up? also one of the dumbest contentions anyone has ever made on here.

https://www.the-independent.com/news...-b2888230.html

https://x.com/AGPamBondi/status/2002...-b2888230.html

Biden, unlike Trump, actually believes in the rule of law. if you want to argue the point, provide some evidence. call bs and i'll give you a mountain of it.

[The_Waco_Kid]

Originally Posted by pxmcc

where are all the Trump photos? let's not forget these 2 gents were best friends for years.

and why the 10 million redactions? the only words that should be redacted are the names of the vics.

and why only drip-drip-drip releases? last Friday was the deadline for all Epstein files to be released, not those of a select few that "just so happen" to feature WJC.

the vics need to sue and the court needs to appoint a Special Master to ensure the DOJ is complying with the law. **spoiler alert** it's not. bigly..

then the DOJ needs to be held in contempt, with progessively nastier sanctions for every new day of wilful refusal to comply with the federal law requiring full disclosure, including having Pam Bondi locked up until she releases all the files, and the Special Master is satisfied that any proposed redactions are necessary only to protect the identities of the vics, not the reputations of the perps, excluding Dems Trump is attempting to disgrace, like WJC, whose reps will be destroyed by Bondi and Trump to the greatest extent possible.

thoughts?

why should victims sue? most want it all to go away and their involvement left unknown. that's why their names are redacted and the photos also.



your supposition Trump and Epstein were best friends is false. running in the same high society circles and attending events doesn't make them best friends.

Originally Posted by pxmcc

just because the Biden admin-whose DOJ admittedly had the Epstein files-believed in following process and procedure, politics be damned, doesn't mean Trump is innocent.
*spoiler alert*he's not..

it doesn't mean he's guilty. it tends to indicate there's no record of anything illegal in the files. if there was yes the Democrats and the DOJ would have released it long ago.

[Salty Again]

... Even the NY Times has admitted that there's been NO EVIDENCE
of President Trump doing anything wrong concerning Epstein,
or Maxwell and their crimes.

... So, WHERE and HOW is there a "cover-up"?? ... For what reason??

#### Salty

[Yssup Rider]

Prove there isn’t, Salty.

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

[pxmcc]

inherent Contempt of Congress is being considered as a tool by the House to force compliance. last time it was used was the 1930s. only requires a majority vote in the House, which considering how bipartisan this issue is, will be pretty easy to obtain.

https://www.npr.org/2025/12/21/nx-s1...gress-contempt

[pxmcc]

Some Epstein documents include ‘untrue and sensationalist claims’ against Trump, says DoJ

to which i reply: lol..

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/...e-news-updates

and Trump said he never flew on Epstein's plane. ya right..

https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2025/...s-with-maxwell

[Yssup Rider]

I saw that. So after fighting to keep them sealed, then redacting over 500 pages of documents and NOT releasing everything as mandated by law, the Turd Reich is arguing that the files say bad things about the Earless Leader?

Of course!

[Precious_b]

Originally Posted by The_Waco_Kid

why should victims sue? most want it all to go away and their involvement left unknown. that's why their names are redacted and the photos also.



your supposition Trump and Epstein were best friends is false. running in the same high society circles and attending events doesn't make them best friends.







it doesn't mean he's guilty. it tends to indicate there's no record of anything illegal in the files. if there was yes the Democrats and the DOJ would have released it long ago.

It's up to the victims to decide how they want to proceed. Not you. And that is their biggest complaint, that is has been politicized. And there are pages that are the opposite of what you said, entirely blacked out EXCEPT for the name of the victim. Seems the DOJ is protecting someone. And a big hint for you, it ain't the victim.

Regardless the degree of such, donny has admitted to being buddies with Epstein.

Originally Posted by Salty Again

... Even the NY Times has admitted that there's been NO EVIDENCE
of President Trump doing anything wrong concerning Epstein,
or Maxwell and their crimes.

... So, WHERE and HOW is there a "cover-up"?? ... For what reason??

#### Salty

How can anyone say there is no evidence when not all the evidence has been released. Especially without heavy handed use of redaction that *appears* to protect the wrong party, the accused. Not the victims.

That can be interpreted as a "cover-up". WHERE, from people who are not following legal instructions to produce what they are ordered to release. HOW by heavily editing what can be seen, especially when the only thing that can be seen on the page is the name of a victim and everything else blacked out.

I say you NaCl-y, For what reason??

[The_Waco_Kid]

Originally Posted by pxmcc

Some Epstein documents include ‘untrue and sensationalist claims’ against Trump, says DoJ

to which i reply: lol..

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/...e-news-updates

and Trump said he never flew on Epstein's plane. ya right..

https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2025/...s-with-maxwell

Trump never said he didn't ride on Epstein's jet show me where he did. guess what trump did say? he never visited Epstein's island. guess what the flight logs show? Trump is right. all that's been available for years this a another fake nothing burger



did you like the part about the fake post card from your article? the one Epstein sent to Larry Nasser? three days after he died? it would be shocking if it wasn't fake yeah?

Originally Posted by Precious_b

It's up to the victims to decide how they want to proceed. Not you. And that is their biggest complaint, that is has been politicized. And there are pages that are the opposite of what you said, entirely blacked out EXCEPT for the name of the victim. Seems the DOJ is protecting someone. And a big hint for you, it ain't the victim.

Regardless the degree of such, donny has admitted to being buddies with Epstein.



How can anyone say there is no evidence when not all the evidence has been released. Especially without heavy handed use of redaction that *appears* to protect the wrong party, the accused. Not the victims.

That can be interpreted as a "cover-up". WHERE, from people who are not following legal instructions to produce what they are ordered to release. HOW by heavily editing what can be seen, especially when the only thing that can be seen on the page is the name of a victim and everything else blacked out.

I say you NaCl-y, For what reason??

it's not up to you either so what's the point except you always presume anything redacted hides some heinous crime by Trump? the media has you boys frothing at the mouth and chasing yer tails like puppies

[pxmcc]

i don't have time rn to research your other points-they may or may not be valid-but you are factually incorrect in your claim that Trump never claimed that he never flew on Epstein's plane. why would he lie about that unless he was covering something up?

Donald Trump has explicitly claimed that he was never on Jeffrey Epstein's plane. This denial, however, is contradicted by flight logs and recent Department of Justice (DOJ) documents released in late 2025.
Trump's Claim
In January 2024, Trump responded to fabricated AI images by posting on Truth Social:
"I was never on Epstein’s Plane, or at his 'stupid' Island".
He also advocated for new laws against AI, citing the fake images as evidence of its risks.
Contradictory Evidence
Official records and investigative files released by the DOJ on December 23, 2025, tell a different story:
Flight Frequency: An internal email from a federal prosecutor released in the latest batch of files indicates that Trump traveled on Epstein's private jet at least eight times between 1993 and 1997.
Specific Passengers: Logs show that on at least four of these flights, Epstein’s associate Ghislaine Maxwell was also on board.
Family Presence: Other passengers listed on these flights at various times include Marla Maples, as well as Trump's children Tiffany and Eric.
Notable Trip: One flight in 1993 listed only three passengers: Epstein, Trump, and an unnamed person described as being 20 years old.
While the flight logs confirm Trump used the aircraft, the DOJ and FBI have stated that many other documents in the recent release contain "unfounded and false" or "sensationalist" claims against him. Additionally, while flight logs confirm trips on the plane, there remains no verified evidence that Trump ever visited Epstein’s private island, Little St. James.

Originally Posted by The_Waco_Kid

Trump never said he didn't ride on Epstein's jet show me where he did. guess what trump did say? he never visited Epstein's island. guess what the flight logs show? Trump is right. all that's been available for years this a another fake nothing burger



did you like the part about the fake post card from your article? the one Epstein sent to Larry Nasser? three days after he died? it would be shocking if it wasn't fake yeah?










it's not up to you either so what's the point except you always presume anything redacted hides some heinous crime by Trump? the media has you boys frothing at the mouth and chasing yer tails like puppies