By 
Steve Benen
  -  
Mon Aug 6, 2012 10:34 AM EDT

Associated Press
President Obama greets troops at Camp Victory in Baghdad.
After spending the last several months paying attention to Mitt Romney's habitual dishonesty 
at a granular level,  I've become largely inured to his more routine, casual lies. Some of  the deliberate falsehoods are just too common to get upset about.
But  once in a while, Romney tells a lie so blatant and offensive that it  raises questions anew about the candidate's character and what standards  of decency he's prepared to abandon to advance his ambitions.
As 
Rachel explained  on the show on Thursday, voting rights in Ohio have been a mess in  recent cycles, and new voter-suppression tactics imposed by state  Republican lawmakers are inviting "chaos" at the polls this fall. Of  particular interest is a state policy that restricts early-voting  rights: active-duty troops can vote up to three days before Election  Day, but no one else.
To that end, President Obama's campaign  filed a lawsuit a few weeks ago, asking a federal court to "restore  in-person early voting for 
all Ohioans during the three days  prior to Election Day." Three weeks later, Romney came up with a new  response to the lawsuit, posting 
this message to Facebook:
 "President Obama's lawsuit claiming it is unconstitutional for Ohio  to allow servicemen and women extended early voting privileges during  the state's early voting period is an outrage. The brave men and women  of our military make tremendous sacrifices to protect and defend our  freedoms, and we should do everything we can to protect their  fundamental right to vote. I stand with the fifteen military groups that  are defending the rights of military voters, and if I'm entrusted to be  the commander-in-chief, I'll work to protect the voting rights of our  military, not undermine them."
 
Got that? Obama wants 
all eligible Ohio voters,  including servicemen and women, to have the same ability to vote, which  Romney says, in writing, means Obama is trying to "undermine" the  troops' ability to vote.
This is as loathsome a lie as Romney has told all year -- and given his record, that's not an easy threshold to meet.
 It's important to realize that this isn't a matter of opinion. CNN's 
headline over the weekend said, "Romney campaign jabs at Obama over voting rights suit." The 
headline on the 
Politico homepage yesterday said, "Obama, Mitt camps spar on military voting."
No. Wrong. No one is "jabbing" or "sparring." One candidate lied and got caught. Full stop.
Indeed, when pressed, Romney's spokesperson 
could  point to "no place in Obama's lawsuit that seeks to restrict the rights  of military voters," and Romney's legal counsel failed to "offer  evidence that Obama's lawsuit would make it tougher for members of the  military to vote."
After the campaign's dishonesty was exposed, Romney 
put a twist on his lie,  saying Obama now opposes giving the troops special treatment. But even  by Republican standards, this is insane -- by this reasoning, Romney  supports a policy that discriminates against military veterans in Ohio  who would be legally prohibited from the same early-voting rights as  active-duty servicemen and women.
Does Romney want to deny special  treatment for veterans of foreign wars? Does Romney think it's  befitting a Commander in Chief to deny equal voting rights to those who  put their lives on the line to defend the United States?
Yesterday, the Republican presidential campaign said the Obama campaign's lawsuit calling for equal voting rights is "
despicable."
It's  as if words no longer have any meaning, and Americans politics has  become so blisteringly stupid, candidates believe they can say literally  anything and get away with it.