Main Menu |
Most Favorited Images |
Recently Uploaded Images |
Most Liked Images |
Top Reviewers |
cockalatte |
650 |
MoneyManMatt |
490 |
Jon Bon |
408 |
Still Looking |
399 |
samcruz |
399 |
Harley Diablo |
377 |
honest_abe |
362 |
George Spelvin |
321 |
DFW_Ladies_Man |
313 |
Starscream66 |
306 |
Chung Tran |
288 |
lupegarland |
287 |
nicemusic |
285 |
You&Me |
281 |
sharkman29 |
263 |
|
Top Posters |
DallasRain | 71439 | biomed1 | 68634 | Yssup Rider | 62981 | gman44 | 55256 | LexusLover | 51038 | offshoredrilling | 49660 | WTF | 48272 | pyramider | 46436 | bambino | 45243 | The_Waco_Kid | 40511 | CryptKicker | 37416 | Mokoa | 36513 | Chung Tran | 36100 | Still Looking | 35944 | Dr-epg | 35539 |
|
|
08-16-2025, 10:53 PM
|
#31
|
Valued Poster
Join Date: Sep 26, 2021
Location: down under Pittsburgh
Posts: 12,300
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by txdot-guy
P.S. Trump is not making crime less he is just making things worse.
|
... So, having National Guard there is NOT making crime LESS??
... Please explain.
#### Salty
|
|
Quote
 | 1 user liked this post
|
08-17-2025, 12:02 AM
|
#32
|
Valued Poster
Join Date: Feb 5, 2025
Location: Springfield
Posts: 585
|
Lied about what election?
|
|
Quote
 | 2 users liked this post
|
08-17-2025, 12:05 AM
|
#33
|
Valued Poster
Join Date: Feb 5, 2025
Location: Springfield
Posts: 585
|
According to crime stats, a small number of criminals cause the most crime. So every violent career criminal taken by the National Guard backed DC police reduces crime maybe X5.
|
|
Quote
 | 1 user liked this post
|
08-17-2025, 04:16 AM
|
#34
|
Valued Poster
Join Date: Aug 5, 2010
Location: Houston Area
Posts: 6,672
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Schwarzer Ritter
According to crime stats, a small number of criminals cause the most crime. So every violent career criminal taken by the National Guard backed DC police reduces crime maybe X5.
|
When Juliani was mayor of NYC, that is pretty much what they found, through the "Stop-and-Frisk" effort. They went after the "Squeegee Men" on street corners and it turned out that in all of New York's over 8 million people, less than 200 were working the corners harassing drivers. And . . .by suppressing the seemingly small crimes they were preventing the large crimes.
|
|
Quote
 | 1 user liked this post
|
08-17-2025, 06:40 AM
|
#35
|
Valued Poster
Join Date: Apr 19, 2017
Location: Dallas
Posts: 5,790
|
You are missing the point. For the left, violence, crime and chaos are tools. They want crime in urban areas because you can’t convince people that a system is broken and needs to be replaced by them of course if the system works.
That’s exactly why Soros targeted prosecutors in large cities. Stop putting away criminals and you increase the chaos in an environment. Particularly in red states… how can a red state deal with a violent city run by blue politicians?
If you understand the true goals, the methods make sense.
That’s why the left will do anything to keep the criminals free, the illegals present, and Trump constrained. Because just like shutting down the borders, it’s not that politicians CAN’T do it, they don’t want to…. Because chaos is useful for gaining power.
Look at California. When Xi visited San Francisco, all the homeless and
shitting on the streets was stopped overnight… and allowed to return afterwards.
The left doesn’t care about citizens lives or property… the only true function of government… they care about fundamentally altering the government to obtain permanent power. Just like they have in California. Which when I was a kid was a fundamentally red state.
|
|
Quote
 | 1 user liked this post
|
08-17-2025, 04:38 PM
|
#36
|
Lifetime Premium Access
Join Date: Jan 1, 2010
Location: Austin Texas
Posts: 4,442
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Salty Again
... So, having National Guard there is NOT making crime LESS??
... Please explain.
#### Salty
|
Let me explain it like this. Trump’s actions in flooding the streets with Federal agents and Soldiers combined with his heavy handed rhetoric does nothing but create controversy and divide the public. It causes protests, filming by everyone, unwarranted arrests and threats, basically all it does is create chaos.
How does creating chaos do anything to stop crime.
This entire situation is all about creating a theatrical narrative and has absolutely nothing to do with crime prevention. If crime is reduced it’s certainly an unintended consequence.
|
|
Quote
 | 2 users liked this post
|
08-17-2025, 06:57 PM
|
#37
|
Lifetime Premium Access
Join Date: Apr 25, 2009
Location: sa tx usa
Posts: 15,657
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by HoHound
Rifleman, Precious, and TxDOT: I'll make a deal with you. You admit that only a deranged Democrat would throw something at a cop. And I'll admit that the felony charge is too extreme. Deal?
...
|
Deals are made in good faith. And good faith requires honesty or sincerity of intention. Let's take them individually.
Honesty requires truth or facts. You have repeatedly demonstrated the lack of posting such when you make statements. The veracity of your sources unerringly are of the type the go with revolver and gateway pundit.
Sincerity. I will be willing to take up *future* deals with you when you correct the former and I will pick up the latter with my intent.
Be waiting to you to have more stringently vetted sources.
So until than, it is impossible to make such a deal for two parties with contrasting perspectives when it comes to facts.
|
|
Quote
 | 1 user liked this post
|
08-17-2025, 07:46 PM
|
#38
|
Valued Poster
Join Date: Mar 4, 2019
Location: In the valley
Posts: 10,954
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Precious_b
You had to go there, Lucas. You know how much maggies detest backing up what they say when called out. And they have a running record like an ultra marathon runner in not supplying a source that proves what they say.
Now, if it were a Panera (sp)sandwich, that would escalate the charge with the dry bread they have.
You know how thin skinned and hyper sensative maggies are and how they act out accordingly.
Think you missed where Lucas pointed out that you maggies did not supply proof of party affiliation. Most we can go on he is from a donny controlled part of goverment, DOJ.
|
Iam going by the video. He threw that sandwich like a little girl, sure sign of a Democrat.
|
|
Quote
 | 2 users liked this post
|
08-19-2025, 09:19 PM
|
#39
|
Lifetime Premium Access
Join Date: Apr 25, 2009
Location: sa tx usa
Posts: 15,657
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Levianon17
Iam going by the video. He threw that sandwich like a little girl, sure sign of a Democrat.
|
Thank you for showing a clear way to spot a demmie.
Now we will know those with popeye sized forearms are the ones who vigorously stroke the little  of their fearless leader.
|
|
Quote
 | 1 user liked this post
|
09-07-2025, 09:08 PM
|
#40
|
Lifetime Premium Access
Join Date: Jan 1, 2010
Location: Austin Texas
Posts: 4,442
|
|
|
Quote
 | 1 user liked this post
|
Yesterday, 01:15 PM
|
#41
|
Valued Poster
Join Date: Apr 19, 2017
Location: Dallas
Posts: 5,790
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by txdot-guy
Let me explain it like this. Trump’s actions in flooding the streets with Federal agents and Soldiers combined with his heavy handed rhetoric does nothing but create controversy and divide the public. It causes protests, filming by everyone, unwarranted arrests and threats, basically all it does is create chaos.
|
LOL... No its not Trumps fault, its the Democrat response to Trump. He's not out there causing demonstrations or anything else... Democrats CHOOSE that response. The only people causing chaos are the protestors and democrats whining about their illegals being deported and their criminals being jailed. The weekend protest in DC was Union organized with preprinted signs and bussed in protestors... Now THAT is theater.
Quote:
Originally Posted by txdot-guy
This entire situation is all about creating a theatrical narrative and has absolutely nothing to do with crime prevention.
|
Yup...that sums up the Democrat response in a nutshell. Create maximum chaos and then appeal to the voters to vote Democrat to stop the chaos. Same ole same old
Quote:
Originally Posted by txdot-guy
If crime is reduced it’s certainly an unintended consequence.
|
Yes, having the NG work directly w/ LEO to increase patrols results in an unintended consequence of lower crime... Do you even hear yourself?
|
|
Quote
 | 1 user liked this post
|
Yesterday, 04:25 PM
|
#42
|
Valued Poster
Join Date: Aug 25, 2024
Location: San Jose
Posts: 158
|
Feds fail to get indictment against DC ‘Subway’ sandwich thrower who DOJ fired
This hasn't been important enough for me to give much of a shit about, but I'm pretty sure I saw that the prune faced twat Pirro can't get an indictment from a Grand Jury. That says something. Because usually prosecutors can get a Grand Jury to indict a rock. lol
https://www.cnbc.com/2025/08/27/feds...-trump-dc.html
Feds fail to get indictment against DC ‘Subway’ sandwich thrower who DOJ fired
|
|
Quote
 | 1 user liked this post
|
Yesterday, 08:13 PM
|
#43
|
Lifetime Premium Access
Join Date: Apr 25, 2009
Location: sa tx usa
Posts: 15,657
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by txdot-guy
|
LOL!
Quote:
Originally Posted by ICU 812
Ok, it was a sandwich.
What if it had been a liter sized bottle of warted?
What if it had been a liter sized bottle of frozen water?
It is my belief that having arrested the sandwich assaulter, others will think twice about throwing something else that could inflict injury on an officer of the law.
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Schwarzer Ritter
Physical contact, like spitting, is enough to close the deal.
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Iceman
I may be mistaken, but I believe the felony charge comes in to play since it's a federal crime.
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by texassapper
Now do the J6ers invited in to the Capitol by DC police.
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by texassapper
lol. If the J6ers were appropriately charged so is the sandwich felon.
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mplay
Zero tolerance. String em up
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by fd-guy
This hasn't been important enough for me to give much of a shit about, but I'm pretty sure I saw that the prune faced twat Pirro can't get an indictment from a Grand Jury. That says something. Because usually prosecutors can get a Grand Jury to indict a rock. lol
https://www.cnbc.com/2025/08/27/feds...-trump-dc.html
Feds fail to get indictment against DC ‘Subway’ sandwich thrower who DOJ fired
|
Oh, the Grand Jury definitely balked at the BS that they were being fed.
As quoted in the article: "The citizen, in the end, in the American system of justice, is the final arbiter."
|
|
Quote
 | 1 user liked this post
|
|
AMPReviews.net |
Find Ladies |
Hot Women |
|